Saturday, February 28, 2009

The Spark That Started a Fire

Anti-Christianity: My own personal 'Non-religion'



Christians predict the coming of an Anti-Christ. This guy or girl can't be that bad really can they? Anti-Christianity doesn't refute the validity of the concept about the absolute. It does however refute the faith used to understand that absolute by followers of religion. You cannot have faith and expect to understand, because faith is belief without Knowledge. You must have only Knowledge.


Logic
If one can truly understand the concept of an absolute- a religion may form because of the inability to explain that concept to those who have not experienced it. Logic leads ultimately to a knowledge of an absolute existing, but being illogically based. Because of that I have adopted an anti-religious philosophy that acknowledges the existence of an absolute. So lets break it down in order that the dis-logic becomes logical:
if everything contained within reality and everything not contained within realty is summed, it is equal to the absolute (0+1=1). However this makes a distinction between 1 and 0 that does not technically exist because neither have an actual value. the inability to fully explain the entire concept mathematically (so that it makes sense) leads one to the knowledge that the inability to do so is only evidence of an absolute because mathematics do not operate in non-reality.


So has it occurred to anyone that all the great men who brought religion to the earth were not sons of god, they were not prophets or kings or anything more than men that truly understood the concept of an absolute (which I'll show you in just a sec)? They were birthed on earth and operated within the same confines that you yourself operate. I mean this on an astronomical scale, if you can understand EVERYTHING (not every detail, or component, or aspect, but the concept of EVERYTHING itself, then its clear as day that religions exist because we are an intelligent species who cannot be taught to think outside our own Self and that inability is a part of reality stemming from absolutes (not created by absolutes) which cannot possibly be confined like our bodies are.

UNDERSTANDING INFINITY:
The absolute is all things contained AND all things not contained.
Or in other words
All things contained in Reality AND all things contained in Non-Reality. However non-reality by definition cannot contain anything.

the state of the absolute


The arrows represent nothingness, because it does not exist it cannot be confined. Existence is confinement regardless of how much it exists.

To further explain:
Mathematics are a symbolic description of reality and it only operates on 1's and 0's. The idea for an absolute truly IS (it does exist) within existence, even if it doesn't exist as a tangible thing (this concept is the first on the antichristians creed). Because of this when programming a computer for instance, one can not program a computer to think for itself without somehow managing to explain the concept the 1 really equals 0 and itself at the same time.


1 = 0 = 1

That is the very simplest way to explain the concept of an absolute. The way to 'believe' in that concept or to have 'faith' in it is by understanding that there are other men who have understood it and simply been unable to explain something that doesn't exist as a part of something that does exist. That faith and belief is not a good thing- because one cannot know the absolute unless they know it, impossible to understand without faith, impossible to understand without knowledge.

That is Heaven AND Hell, because the absolute IS comprehend-able, just not explainable.

On a similar note, simply because you can't explain it, the concept is proven true. But you can't understand why you understand it. That is the question of life, and the answer to the life problem you have to 100% fully understand that you don't understand.



The same things can be seen in every religions beginnings. When compared to themselves the concept of an absolute was best explained in each religions own way. Heaven hell, yin yang, etc. to better explain what those concepts meant they also each went about it in different ways. Becoming 1 with the universe and the not-universe was the goal; 1 = 0 = 1 was the goal. In Christianity, Christ was only a man who understood the concept of an absolute but was unable to explain it to others (and worked 'miracles' most likely by trickery because it was the best to get people to listen to his attempts to explain what he understood), who because of that obviously got the meaning wrong because they were stuck trying to make sense of a mathematical quandary that could not operate. To further illustrate this concept: It is best described as:
1=0=1
and best explained for understanding as:
(1 = 0)=1
and most realistically explained as:
(1 = 0)=1)
Please note the lack of the beginning parentheses, to me this illustrated that the equation cannot be confined to itself. For if it were we would not exist.
And for those of you unfamiliar with mathematics:
The meaning of life is that it has no meaning within itself, it simply is what it is.

that's quite possibly the hardest thing to understand: that you can't understand.
But the problem is for me now, because I comprehend it, is it really possible to explain it? I firmly know that an Anti-Christian religion will one day emerge which would attempt to debunk religion as a practice, but not debunk the absolute itself. I suppose since I believe it I'll be the first one to say it, 'I am an Anti-Christian'

Spin that like a Globe.

So to attempt to define what I am going to do with my understanding is shown below once again.
I just became the an Anti-Christian (a misnomer because there have been many men like Jesus, each just as correct about the state of the absolute as he was). Anyway, i figured out that if one were to operate on this premise, that they would be led to believe the following creed:

The Anti-Christian Creed

Christ was an Anti-Christian

----------------------------------------------------------------

Thought is Dis-Logic

Dis-logic validates Logic

Thought precedes Knowledge

Faith is Fallacy

Knowledge is Truth

Faithing is for those who do not Know

Knowing is for those who do not Faith

The Soul and the Self are the same thing.

1=0=1
----------------------------------------------------------------




The 13 Tenets of Anti-Christianity



1. Value the Absolute

2. Value Reality

3. Value Non-Reality

4. Value Life

5. Feel no Greed nor Regret

6. Value Non-Life

7. Value Self

8. Value Non-Self

9. Do not support conflict based on an assumed Reality

10. Do not impose false Reality for personal gain purposefully

11. Value opinion based in Reality

12. Allow Reality to validate your Self

13. Allow yourself to validate Reality


13 cheers for 'Anti-Christians' Hip Hip Hurray!
Peace and Love,
Matt the Anti-Christian